In a surprising rhetorical
move, Ignacio Ramonet, a Spanish journalist close to chavismo and former editor-in-chief of Le Monde diplomatique, argues that a sign that we live in a “post-truth”
era is that some people do not accept
the obvious fact that the Venezuelan government is the victim of a conspiracy.
Conspiracy theorists
commonly refute their critics by accusing them of also being part of the conspiracy
or of being “official conspiracy theorists,” but this must be one of the first
times the new term “post-truth” is used by a conspiracy theorist to characterize
the sceptics’ “post-factual relativism.”
Here are the key
paragraphs from his end
of the year article for Telesur:
All this in the context of a long duration media war against
Caracas which began with Hugo Chávez arrival to power in 1999, and which has
intensified since April 2013. It reached unheard of levels of violence after
the election of President Nicolás Maduro.
This atmosphere of permanent and aggressive media harassment,
of insidious misinformation about Venezuela, has confused even many of the
friends of the Bolivarian Revolution. Especially because, in this “post-truth”
era, the practice of lying, the intellectual fraud, and shameless deception is
not punished by any negative consequence, not in terms of credibility or loss
of image. Anything goes, everything is useful in this “era of post-factual relativism,”
and not even the most objective facts are taken into consideration. Not even
the arguments of plots and conspiracies –which are so obvious in the Venezuelan
case, - are accepted. Beforehand, the dominant media discourse characterizes and
denounces the “supposed plots” as the unacceptable arguments of an “old
narrative”…
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.