Yesterday,
during the events celebrating the anniversary of Venezuela’s declaration of independence
from Spain, Maduro announced he would offer Snowden humanitarian asylum
to protect him “form the persecution unleashed by the most powerful empire of
the world against a young man that has only told the truth.” No word yet form
Snowden if he will accept (Nicaragua has also issued an offer to process his
asylum request.)
There is certain
irony in Maduro praising Snowden’s actions. The Venezuelan security services routinely
records phone conversations of political opponents. Sometimes these recordings
make star appearances in public state TV programs. Indeed now disgraced Venezolana de Televisión (VTV) presenter
Mario Silva owed much of his fame to his use of these recordings in his show La Hojilla, until he became a victim of
his own methods.
Of course phone
tapping does not amount to a full “surveillance program”. And the Venezuelan
security services are far from the technological capabilities necessary for
internet surveillance.
Or are they?
Back in January
the New York Times carried an article on a report by the Citizen Lab of the
Munk School of Global Affairs of the University of Toronto. The report claimed that technology for internet
surveillance made by Blue Coat Systems, California, was being used for
censoring purposes by a long list of countries, mentioned last among them was
Venezuela.
However in the actual report from Citizen Lab, Venezuela was only mentioned in a final paragraph. The
report stated that: “We identified a single installation of PacketShaper on a
netblock belonging to CANTV Servicios, one of the country’s largest
telecommunications providers and a state-owned enterprise. This was identified
by Shodan in August 2012 and was verified during testing. There is no current
evidence of filtering of political or social sites in Venezuela. However,
Reporters Without Borders has expressed concern that the lack of extensive
Internet censorship in the country ignores other methods of controlling
Venezuelan cyberspace, such as the monitoring of Internet forums and websites
for politically sensitive content.”
In short, the
report claimed that Venezuela has the
technology but had not yet actually used it for censoring, much less fur surveillance.
It does however quote and repeat the concerns form Reporters Without Frontiers
and Freedom House that the Venezuelan government is using other methods to
control opinions in cyberspace.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.