The Spanish international news agency EFE
published a note yesterday (August 31) about conspiracy theories in Venezuela, focusing
on the constant claims by President Nicolás Maduro of magnicidio plots to assassinate him.
EFE quotes the opinions of Alberto Barrera, a
writer and author of a biography of Chávez, and Nicmer Evans, a pro-government intellectual
and part time lecturer at the Universidad Central de Venezuela.
For Barrera the constant claims of plots
reflect a “pre political society” in constant threat of “a hecatomb that never
happens.” Barrera thinks that conspiracy theories are used by Maduro to
generate cohesion among chavistas: “the
aim is to generate huge threats so that supporters close ranks in the defense
of Maduro.”
But Nicmer Evans believes that conspiracy
theories should not be discarded as mere paranoia: “I would not accuse the position
of Venezuela’s political leaders as paranoid because history has shown very
clearly that there are profound reasons to make them think this way.” Evans
believes that the magnicidio plot
claims are true and that they go beyond killing the President: “the fundamental
objective of all this is Venezuela’s oil.”
However Evans does believe that perhaps the government
has somewhat exaggerated conspiracy announcements: “With the issue of the magnicidio we are like in the wolf
fable, ‘here comes the wolf!’ and when the wolf finally comes nobody will
notice because they warned too many times that it was going to come.”
Both Barrera and Evans make interesting
points on the issue of the effectiveness of the political use of conspiracy
theories. Barrera, who clearly does not believe in these theories, thinks that they
are used by the government as tools for the creation of internal cohesion.
Evans (a pro-government believer),
seems to think that even if the theories are true, the government has to reveal
them in a smaller dosage if it wants to be taken seriously.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.